Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

Imperial Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

22

8

4

+14

92

3:0

6

0

8.2

+37%

14

12

4

+2

87

3:3

3

0

6.9

+12%

12

9

4

+3

75

2:2

2

0

6.4

+1%

11

11

8

0

78

1:1

3

0

6.4

+2%

11

9

5

+2

78

2:1

3

0

6.1

+4%

Total

70

49

25

+21

409

11:7

17

0

6.8

+11%

Sharks Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

14

2

-3

72

2:2

3

0

5.4

-8%

10

12

2

-2

53

2:2

3

0

5.3

-18%

9

17

7

-8

86

2:4

1

0

5.3

-6%

11

14

0

-3

67

1:3

4

0

5.0

-19%

8

13

3

-5

55

0:0

1

0

5.0

-26%

Total

49

70

14

-21

334

7:11

12

0

5.2

-16%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Imperial vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Imperial on Anubis Analysis

Imperial demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Imperial on Anubis were HEN1, who contributed 22 kills, and felps, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7370 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Imperial held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Anubis included doc, who contributed 11 kills, and Gafolo, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6005 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Imperial from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date