0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:19s01:26s
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3023
Smoke thrown on a map
2114.6931
AK47 kills on a map
166.5888
AK47 damage (avg/round)
69.625.3
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
60%
Mirage
50%
Nuke
35%
Inferno
24%
Anubis
20%
Vertigo
5%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
73
Mirage
76%
37
7
Nuke
60%
35
18
Inferno
63%
24
25
Anubis
59%
27
15
Vertigo
53%
17
36
Dust II
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
60%
20
20
Mirage
26%
23
31
Nuke
25%
24
22
Inferno
39%
18
20
Anubis
79%
34
0
Vertigo
48%
29
5
Dust II
0%
0
6
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Imperial vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Imperial and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Imperial. The MVP of this match was felps.
Imperial analytics
The team Imperial secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Imperial were felps contributed 20 kills and HEN1 contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8506 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Imperial held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were doc contributed 13 kills and drg contributed 12 kills. 7173 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent Imperial from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments