0 Comments
190
155
32
+35
391
26:26
45
3
Dust II6.1
+9%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
46%
Overpass
40%
Nuke
38%
Mirage
31%
Inferno
17%
Dust II
15%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
54%
13
4
Overpass
60%
20
11
Nuke
38%
16
10
Mirage
40%
25
13
Inferno
67%
3
35
Dust II
52%
25
8
Ancient
50%
26
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
2
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
3
Mirage
71%
7
0
Inferno
50%
6
2
Dust II
67%
3
3
Ancient
50%
2
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllww
- wwllw
Info
Match analysis of Illuminar vs Strive in chaos by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Illuminar and Strive in chaos, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Mirage, and victory was secured by Strive in chaos. The MVP of this match was joel.
Strive in chaos analytics
The team Strive in chaos secured 52 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Mirage. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Strive in chaos were joel contributed 57 kills and Maki contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20374 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Strive in chaos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 27 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Illuminar analytics
The team Illuminar managed to secure 0 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Illuminar were mASKED contributed 51 kills and morelz contributed 28 kills. 18190 of total damage by Illuminar could not prevent Strive in chaos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Illuminar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments