0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
31.8168
M4A1 kills on a map
84.3478
Percentage of headshots
41%16%
AWP kills on a map
166.3324
USP kills on a map
51.5986
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
Kills on a map
26.0416.7206
Damage (avg/round)
160.11847.8
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:55s
Player score (round)
42151010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
57%
Vertigo
55%
Anubis
49%
Mirage
23%
Inferno
11%
Ancient
9%
Nuke
8%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
57%
61
3
Vertigo
55%
20
7
Anubis
49%
53
3
Mirage
27%
41
20
Inferno
11%
9
29
Ancient
38%
50
15
Nuke
41%
17
21
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Ancient
29%
7
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Info
Match analysis of Illuminar vs Haspers by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Illuminar and Haspers, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Illuminar. The MVP of this match was SpavaQ.
Illuminar analytics
The team Illuminar secured 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Illuminar were SpavaQ contributed 26 kills and kadziu contributed 10 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6850 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Illuminar held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Haspers analytics
The team Haspers managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Haspers were bajmi contributed 9 kills and AdrieN contributed 7 kills. 4162 of total damage by Haspers could not prevent Illuminar from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Haspers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments