0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.3
6.9
Mirage1.7
Win Rounds
8
16
Mirage8
Kills
73
96
Mirage23
Damage
7.92K
10.21K
Mirage2297
Economy
438.9K
516.85K
Mirage77950
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
L
60%
Nuke
55%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
14%
Overpass
13%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
40%
15
4
Nuke
55%
11
3
Dust II
50%
8
0
Vertigo
50%
4
8
Mirage
64%
22
0
Overpass
13%
8
3
Ancient
0%
2
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllww
- lllll
Info
Match analysis of Lagom vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lagom and Budapest Five, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Budapest Five. The MVP of this match was keen.
Budapest Five analytics
The team Budapest Five secured 0 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five were keen contributed 21 kills and EspiranTo contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10214 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lagom analytics
The team Lagom managed to secure 24 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lagom were SlooKy contributed 15 kills and uNdo contributed 14 kills. 8098 of total damage by Lagom could not prevent Budapest Five from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lagom struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments