0 Comments
81
70
32
+11
407
10:12
20
2
Anubis6.4
+11%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42881011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
- Starter
- —
- —
- —
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
57%
Mirage
45%
Anubis
43%
Ancient
10%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
33%
3
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
57%
7
0
Mirage
78%
9
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Ancient
43%
14
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwlw
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of HyperSpirit vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HyperSpirit and HOTU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by HOTU. The MVP of this match was lampada.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HOTU were lampada contributed 21 kills and anttzz contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8963 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HOTU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HyperSpirit analytics
The team HyperSpirit managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HyperSpirit were swiiffter contributed 21 kills and kritik contributed 17 kills. 7580 of total damage by HyperSpirit could not prevent HOTU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HyperSpirit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments