0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.33.6
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
9826.2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:23s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:24s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
44%
Vertigo
38%
Ancient
21%
Nuke
11%
Dust II
8%
Anubis
1%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
29%
7
29
Vertigo
33%
18
10
Ancient
43%
28
8
Nuke
52%
25
9
Dust II
58%
36
1
Anubis
67%
3
35
Mirage
50%
22
3
Last 5 maps
Inferno
73%
15
21
Vertigo
71%
38
4
Ancient
64%
28
8
Nuke
63%
27
29
Dust II
50%
2
23
Anubis
68%
34
10
Mirage
50%
18
34
Info
Match analysis of Hype vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Hype and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was insani.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 29 kills and exit contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11380 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hype analytics
The team Hype managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hype were rainny contributed 24 kills and history contributed 22 kills. 9846 of total damage by Hype could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hype struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments