Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
144.4189
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Player score (round)
35481010
Damage (total/round)
41673
Player score (round)
47501010
Player's aces
1
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Zeus kills
1
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
67%
Inferno
37%
Vertigo
15%
Dust II
14%
Ancient
7%
Mirage
4%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
67%
3
24
Inferno
17%
6
18
Vertigo
42%
12
4
Dust II
57%
35
1
Ancient
50%
24
3
Mirage
59%
17
3
Nuke
50%
22
6
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
88
Inferno
54%
52
11
Vertigo
57%
28
26
Dust II
71%
14
20
Ancient
43%
42
29
Mirage
55%
44
14
Nuke
52%
50
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Hype vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Hype and Case, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was urban0.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 26 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were urban0 contributed 42 kills and bsd contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17106 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hype analytics
The team Hype managed to secure 18 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hype were history contributed 38 kills and vinaabEAST contributed 31 kills. 13824 of total damage by Hype could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hype struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments