0 Comments
73
66
22
+7
400
6:14
22
1
Overpass6
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
75%
Nuke
54%
Vertigo
52%
Overpass
32%
Mirage
7%
Inferno
3%
Anubis
2%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
75%
8
0
Nuke
0%
3
3
Vertigo
0%
0
10
Overpass
0%
3
0
Mirage
43%
7
0
Inferno
43%
7
8
Anubis
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
63
Nuke
54%
37
3
Vertigo
52%
21
28
Overpass
32%
25
27
Mirage
50%
40
6
Inferno
40%
25
6
Anubis
69%
36
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of HOTU vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HOTU and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was swiftsteel.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were aVN contributed 18 kills and simke contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7999 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HOTU were swiftsteel contributed 18 kills and nitzie contributed 14 kills. 7059 of total damage by HOTU could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments