0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4482
AK47 kills on a map
126.5019
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4482
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3014
Trades on a map
63.428
Player score (round)
36211010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
71%
Inferno
60%
Vertigo
60%
Ancient
33%
Mirage
27%
Nuke
24%
Anubis
16%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
3
Vertigo
100%
1
2
Ancient
71%
17
0
Mirage
67%
6
0
Nuke
50%
8
1
Anubis
40%
10
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
71%
7
4
Inferno
60%
30
1
Vertigo
40%
10
9
Ancient
38%
24
8
Mirage
40%
5
11
Nuke
74%
23
2
Anubis
56%
16
6
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of HOTU vs Rhyno by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HOTU and Rhyno, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Rhyno. The MVP of this match was Ag1L.
Rhyno analytics
The team Rhyno secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rhyno were Ag1L contributed 17 kills and TMKj contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6413 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rhyno held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HOTU were fineshine52 contributed 11 kills and anttzz contributed 9 kills. 4992 of total damage by HOTU could not prevent Rhyno from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments