0 Comments
70
56
19
+14
415
8:10
19
0
Ancient6.6
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
116.5888
USP kills on a map
31.6074
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
AK47 kills on a map
116.5888
Damage (avg/round)
139.71897.4
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
50%
Nuke
43%
Anubis
7%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
75%
8
0
Nuke
57%
7
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Ancient
50%
16
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Mirage
25%
4
0
Nuke
100%
3
0
Anubis
50%
8
0
Ancient
45%
11
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- wllww
Info
Match analysis of HOTU vs RAPTORS EC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HOTU and RAPTORS EC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by HOTU. The MVP of this match was mizu.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HOTU were mizu contributed 22 kills and anttzz contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7461 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HOTU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
RAPTORS EC analytics
The team RAPTORS EC managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for RAPTORS EC were WFN contributed 13 kills and BehinDx contributed 14 kills. 6155 of total damage by RAPTORS EC could not prevent HOTU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, RAPTORS EC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments