Ancient
16 - 9
Inferno
11 - 16
Mirage
16 - 8
HOTU Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

13

1

-2

81

0:1

2

1

6.2

-6%

10

15

4

-5

73

2:2

2

0

5.7

-8%

8

15

2

-7

62

1:2

1

0

4.9

-14%

6

12

2

-6

51

1:0

1

0

4.8

-19%

6

12

1

-6

45

2:6

2

0

4.3

-24%

Total

41

67

10

-26

312

6:11

8

1

5.2

-14%

Nemiga Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

17

7

1

+10

88

2:1

5

1

7.8

+24%

14

6

3

+8

92

1:1

3

0

7.1

+25%

14

10

7

+4

94

2:2

4

0

6.9

+29%

11

7

0

+4

56

5:1

2

0

6.3

+8%

10

11

6

-1

83

1:1

1

0

5.8

+1%

Total

66

41

17

+25

413

11:6

15

1

6.8

+17%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of HOTU vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team

Nemiga on Inferno Analysis

Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 11 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Nemiga on Inferno were Jyo, who contributed 17 kills, and SynyX, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7025 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HOTU on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for HOTU, as they managed to secure 6 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HOTU on Inferno included gokushima, who contributed 11 kills, and kuunso, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5299 total damage, HOTU couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date