0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8161
M4A1 kills on a map
114.5517
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
Trades on a map
8.973.4876
Assists on a map
11.964.3808
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:54s
Player score (round)
48321011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
70%
Vertigo
60%
Mirage
38%
Overpass
33%
Ancient
23%
Nuke
17%
Anubis
10%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Mirage
78%
9
0
Overpass
0%
3
0
Ancient
30%
10
0
Nuke
33%
6
0
Anubis
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
70%
10
3
Vertigo
60%
10
0
Mirage
40%
5
5
Overpass
33%
3
1
Ancient
53%
17
4
Nuke
50%
2
9
Anubis
57%
14
2
Info
Match analysis of HOTU vs K10 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HOTU and K10, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by K10. The MVP of this match was shyyne.
K10 analytics
The team K10 secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for K10 were shyyne contributed 23 kills and SLY contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9307 overall damage.
On the defensive side, K10 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HOTU were swiftsteel contributed 20 kills and casE contributed 16 kills. 8507 of total damage by HOTU could not prevent K10 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments