0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
174.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
86.616.7
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.52
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5330
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0371
Smoke thrown on a map
2015.0371
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.53.8
HE damage (avg/round)
11.83.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
L
67%
Ancient
67%
Dust II
42%
Vertigo
25%
Overpass
10%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
L
4%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
33%
6
15
Ancient
67%
15
3
Dust II
67%
12
7
Vertigo
25%
12
4
Overpass
70%
10
5
Inferno
57%
14
5
Nuke
60%
15
4
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
4
Ancient
0%
0
3
Dust II
25%
4
1
Vertigo
0%
3
0
Overpass
60%
5
2
Inferno
50%
2
2
Nuke
64%
14
0
Info
Match analysis of HONORIS vs LF0 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HONORIS and LF0, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by LF0. The MVP of this match was JACKPOT.
LF0 analytics
The team LF0 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LF0 were JACKPOT contributed 37 kills and eightz999 contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20662 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LF0 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HONORIS analytics
The team HONORIS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HONORIS were Sobol contributed 41 kills and reiko contributed 36 kills. 16513 of total damage by HONORIS could not prevent LF0 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HONORIS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments