Virtus.pro Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

18

4

+1

73

6:6

4

0

6.3

-2%

15

19

4

-4

63

3:2

3

0

5.8

-11%

14

15

4

-1

61

0:2

4

2

5.6

-7%

17

19

3

-2

67

2:4

5

0

5.6

-13%

13

14

1

-1

48

2:1

3

0

5.3

-20%

Total

78

85

16

-7

314

13:15

19

2

5.7

-11%

HEROIC Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

14

1

+10

87

6:3

6

1

7.6

+21%

20

15

2

+5

71

4:0

4

0

6.5

+6%

16

15

5

+1

68

3:4

3

0

5.9

0%

14

17

3

-3

58

1:1

3

0

5.4

-13%

11

17

2

-6

54

1:5

3

1

5.0

-23%

Total

85

78

13

+7

337

15:13

19

2

6.1

-2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Virtus.pro vs HEROIC by the Bo3.gg Team

HEROIC on Inferno Analysis

HEROIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for HEROIC on Inferno were TeSeS, who contributed 24 kills, and cadiaN, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9446 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, HEROIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Virtus.pro, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno included YEKINDAR, who contributed 19 kills, and Qikert, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8778 total damage, Virtus.pro couldn't prevent HEROIC from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date