Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
51.616
USP damage (avg/round)
17.44.6
M4A1 kills on a map
164.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
4716.7
Damage (total/round)
48773
Player score (round)
43511012
Player score (round)
35171012
Player's aces
1
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
80%
Dust II
75%
Inferno
60%
Nuke
18%
Mirage
8%
Vertigo
5%
Overpass
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
20%
5
15
Dust II
0%
0
28
Inferno
60%
10
3
Nuke
57%
14
3
Mirage
50%
12
8
Vertigo
75%
8
3
Overpass
64%
11
1
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
7
6
Dust II
75%
8
2
Inferno
0%
0
28
Nuke
75%
12
1
Mirage
42%
12
5
Vertigo
80%
5
16
Overpass
60%
10
12
Info
Match analysis of HEROIC vs Spirit by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HEROIC and Spirit, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Spirit. The MVP of this match was Patsi.
Spirit analytics
The team Spirit secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Spirit were Patsi contributed 24 kills and s1ren contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9462 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Spirit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HEROIC analytics
The team HEROIC managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HEROIC were cadiaN contributed 22 kills and stavn contributed 18 kills. 9395 of total damage by HEROIC could not prevent Spirit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HEROIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments