Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
104.6963
HE kills on a map
21.127
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:22s00:39s
HE damage (avg/round)
12.73.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.22
HE damage (avg/round)
11.13.4
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0371
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35311012
Player score (round)
36781012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
64%
Nuke
62%
Ancient
23%
Inferno
15%
Vertigo
15%
Overpass
14%
Mirage
13%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
35
Nuke
62%
13
3
Ancient
50%
8
13
Inferno
73%
15
10
Vertigo
38%
8
10
Overpass
64%
14
2
Mirage
50%
12
15
Last 5 maps
Dust II
64%
11
14
Nuke
0%
0
35
Ancient
73%
22
2
Inferno
58%
24
5
Vertigo
53%
15
16
Overpass
50%
14
10
Mirage
63%
8
8
Info
Match analysis of HEROIC vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HEROIC and Sangal, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by HEROIC. The MVP of this match was cadiaN.
HEROIC analytics
The team HEROIC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HEROIC were cadiaN contributed 25 kills and stavn contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8609 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HEROIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were ScrunK contributed 11 kills and soulfly contributed 9 kills. 5370 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent HEROIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments