0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
174.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
55.116.7
USP kills on a map
51.616
USP damage (avg/round)
164.6
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Shots (total/round)
9116
Player score (round)
41481012
Damage (total/round)
46773
Shots (total/round)
10016
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
63%
Overpass
30%
Vertigo
23%
Inferno
17%
Nuke
13%
Mirage
3%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
34
Overpass
86%
14
1
Vertigo
67%
9
6
Inferno
67%
12
8
Nuke
60%
15
4
Mirage
56%
9
14
Ancient
38%
8
12
Last 5 maps
Dust II
63%
19
0
Overpass
56%
9
24
Vertigo
44%
9
7
Inferno
50%
2
40
Nuke
47%
19
6
Mirage
59%
17
10
Ancient
40%
10
19
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of HEROIC vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HEROIC and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by HEROIC. The MVP of this match was TeSeS.
HEROIC analytics
The team HEROIC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HEROIC were TeSeS contributed 23 kills and cadiaN contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10386 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HEROIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were faveN contributed 21 kills and tabseN contributed 22 kills. 9961 of total damage by BIG could not prevent HEROIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments