Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle damage (avg/round)
16.65.4
Molotov kills on a map
21.0849
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.22
Galil kills on a map
71.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
24.85.6
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0371
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
133.8
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5430
Shots (total/round)
11016
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Overpass
58%
Nuke
50%
Inferno
48%
Dust II
17%
Ancient
13%
Vertigo
5%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
4
19
Overpass
42%
12
9
Nuke
50%
16
2
Inferno
48%
23
0
Dust II
67%
3
8
Ancient
20%
10
6
Vertigo
80%
5
13
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
4
Overpass
100%
3
2
Nuke
0%
1
5
Inferno
0%
4
2
Dust II
50%
2
6
Ancient
33%
3
2
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Info
Match analysis of hREDS vs ECSTATIC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between hREDS and ECSTATIC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by hREDS. The MVP of this match was eDi.
hREDS analytics
The team hREDS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for hREDS were eDi contributed 20 kills and Sm1llee contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9048 overall damage.
On the defensive side, hREDS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECSTATIC analytics
The team ECSTATIC managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECSTATIC were FASHR contributed 12 kills and maNkz contributed 14 kills. 7084 of total damage by ECSTATIC could not prevent hREDS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECSTATIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments