0 Comments
276
302
52
-26
363
40:46
72
3
Mirage6.2
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Anubis
100%
Nuke
86%
Dust II
75%
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
17%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
2
6
Anubis
100%
1
0
Nuke
86%
7
2
Dust II
75%
4
2
Vertigo
50%
10
2
Inferno
33%
9
1
Mirage
67%
6
5
Ancient
0%
0
18
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- w
- wwlll
Info
Match analysis of Hello Kitten vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Hello Kitten and Rooster, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Overpass, Mirage, and victory was secured by Rooster. The MVP of this match was chelleos.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rooster were chelleos contributed 69 kills and nettik contributed 70 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32191 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hello Kitten analytics
The team Hello Kitten managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hello Kitten were val contributed 60 kills and Falcon contributed 55 kills. 31328 of total damage by Hello Kitten could not prevent Rooster from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hello Kitten struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments