0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.5986
Shots (total/round)
8316
Player score (round)
37071010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:24s
AK47 kills on a map
146.4203
AK47 damage (avg/round)
71.625.2
HE damage (avg/round)
14.83.4
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
38%
Nuke
24%
Dust II
22%
Ancient
21%
Mirage
12%
Anubis
11%
Inferno
8%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
13
Nuke
68%
25
0
Dust II
22%
9
5
Ancient
34%
35
0
Mirage
52%
21
3
Anubis
32%
19
5
Inferno
50%
8
4
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
38%
8
3
Nuke
44%
25
3
Dust II
0%
1
14
Ancient
55%
51
1
Mirage
40%
25
3
Anubis
43%
23
3
Inferno
42%
12
4
Info
Match analysis of Heimo vs WOPA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Heimo and WOPA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by Heimo. The MVP of this match was arvid.
Heimo analytics
The team Heimo secured 26 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Heimo were arvid contributed 37 kills and Spargo contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16329 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Heimo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA managed to secure 14 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WOPA were Leakz contributed 31 kills and sL1m3 contributed 28 kills. 12994 of total damage by WOPA could not prevent Heimo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WOPA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments