0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
31.6558
Assists on a map
94.4315
Trades on a map
63.428
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Player score (round)
38771010
Player score (round)
36901010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Dust II
67%
Ancient
36%
Inferno
29%
Mirage
22%
Nuke
18%
Anubis
5%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
7
Dust II
67%
3
2
Ancient
42%
19
0
Inferno
29%
7
3
Mirage
38%
16
4
Nuke
62%
21
0
Anubis
45%
11
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
2
Dust II
0%
2
0
Ancient
78%
18
0
Inferno
0%
0
3
Mirage
60%
5
0
Nuke
44%
9
1
Anubis
40%
10
2
Info
Match analysis of Heimo vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Heimo and HOTU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by HOTU. The MVP of this match was lampada.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HOTU were lampada contributed 19 kills and anttzz contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7199 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HOTU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Heimo analytics
The team Heimo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Heimo were Welho contributed 12 kills and japE contributed 10 kills. 5285 of total damage by Heimo could not prevent HOTU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Heimo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments