Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

Overpass
16 - 13
Nuke
7 - 16
Anubis
16 - 4
HAVU Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

18

2

+1

93

4:2

5

1

7.0

+12%

10

18

4

-8

52

1:0

2

1

5.1

-27%

13

18

4

-5

66

0:5

2

0

5.1

-14%

11

20

2

-9

58

1:4

2

0

4.8

-30%

11

20

2

-9

52

3:3

1

0

4.7

-35%

Total

64

94

14

-30

321

9:14

12

2

5.3

-19%

SINNERS Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

14

7

+4

86

4:2

5

0

7.1

+7%

19

11

5

+8

88

3:1

5

1

7.0

+20%

23

14

4

+9

101

3:5

6

0

7.0

+39%

18

12

3

+6

78

3:1

4

0

6.6

+12%

16

13

2

+3

65

1:0

5

0

5.9

+3%

Total

94

64

21

+30

417

14:9

25

1

6.7

+16%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of HAVU vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team

SINNERS on Nuke Analysis

SINNERS demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SINNERS on Nuke were oskar, who contributed 18 kills, and ZEDKO, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9599 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Nuke included doto, who contributed 19 kills, and Spargo, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7379 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent SINNERS from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date