Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.616
M4A1 kills on a map
144.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
47.416.7
Shots (total/round)
8316
Shots (total/round)
8516
Damage (total/round)
43573
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38481012
Damage (total/round)
42673
Player score (round)
39811012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
69%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Overpass
17%
Mirage
17%
Ancient
10%
Inferno
9%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
69%
13
1
Dust II
50%
8
3
Vertigo
0%
0
18
Overpass
0%
3
9
Mirage
50%
6
8
Ancient
60%
5
7
Inferno
71%
14
6
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
9
Dust II
0%
0
2
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Overpass
17%
6
2
Mirage
67%
9
0
Ancient
50%
2
7
Inferno
80%
5
0
Info
Match analysis of HAVU vs IKLA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HAVU and IKLA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by IKLA. The MVP of this match was Kvem.
IKLA analytics
The team IKLA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for IKLA were Kvem contributed 60 kills and SENSEi contributed 52 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28784 overall damage.
On the defensive side, IKLA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were xseveN contributed 52 kills and Aerial contributed 50 kills. 26382 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent IKLA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments