HAVU Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

31

27

10

+4

111

5:10

8

0

7.3

+33%

26

19

6

+7

73

2:1

6

1

6.7

+8%

23

21

6

+2

77

3:3

7

1

6.4

+3%

23

20

4

+3

69

2:4

3

0

6.0

0%

15

23

6

-8

52

2:3

2

0

4.9

-23%

Total

118

110

32

+8

381

14:21

26

2

6.2

+4%

EYEBALLERS Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

22

12

-1

92

7:3

3

0

6.7

+7%

28

25

8

+3

81

2:1

6

1

6.5

+6%

24

23

5

+1

61

4:1

4

0

6.2

0%

25

21

3

+4

62

4:5

6

0

5.9

-1%

12

27

10

-15

64

4:4

3

0

4.9

-24%

Total

110

118

38

-8

361

21:14

22

1

6.0

-2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of HAVU vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team

HAVU on Inferno Analysis

HAVU demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 18 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for HAVU on Inferno were Airax, who contributed 31 kills, and Banjo, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12952 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 16 out of 34 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included flusha, who contributed 21 kills, and Peppzor, who added 28 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12261 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent HAVU from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date