0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.92
HE damage (avg/round)
13.63.4
Shots (total/round)
9016
Player score (round)
44651012
Damage (total/round)
38473
Player score (round)
37931012
Shots (total/round)
8616
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
63%
Vertigo
51%
Mirage
33%
Dust II
25%
Inferno
22%
Ancient
20%
Overpass
18%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
63%
16
5
Vertigo
20%
5
42
Mirage
44%
16
19
Dust II
65%
26
2
Inferno
80%
10
12
Ancient
47%
17
15
Overpass
43%
23
8
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
16
Vertigo
71%
7
1
Mirage
77%
13
0
Dust II
40%
5
6
Inferno
58%
12
0
Ancient
67%
3
11
Overpass
25%
8
2
Info
Match analysis of HAVU vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HAVU and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Inferno, and victory was secured by HAVU. The MVP of this match was Aerial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU secured 32 out of 59 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Inferno. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HAVU were Aerial contributed 53 kills and jemi contributed 46 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21955 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 27 out of 59 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were capseN contributed 42 kills and nbqq contributed 39 kills. 19968 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent HAVU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments