0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.72
Shots accuracy (%)
46%18%
Headshots (total/map)
228
Deagle kills on a map
71.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
21.65.4
Headshots on a map
21.870.3102
Damage (total/round)
39073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Molotov damage (total/round)
14323.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
82%
Mirage
75%
Dust II
45%
Nuke
44%
Inferno
39%
Overpass
21%
Train
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Mirage
0%
2
1
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Inferno
0%
1
2
Overpass
50%
2
0
Train
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
82%
11
6
Mirage
75%
16
2
Dust II
55%
22
3
Nuke
44%
18
6
Inferno
39%
18
10
Overpass
29%
7
23
Train
50%
2
31
Info
Match analysis of HAVU vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HAVU and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Train, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was XANTARES.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Train. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were XANTARES contributed 54 kills and tabseN contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19417 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were xseveN contributed 35 kills and sLowi contributed 30 kills. 15543 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments