Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:26s
USP kills on a map
31.6074
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
14.54
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
12126.4
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:18s00:05s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:26s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Mirage
64%
Inferno
60%
Ancient
36%
Anubis
22%
Vertigo
7%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
5
16
Mirage
11%
9
13
Inferno
0%
1
18
Ancient
24%
21
1
Anubis
38%
8
7
Vertigo
60%
5
5
Nuke
50%
14
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
3
9
Mirage
75%
4
2
Inferno
60%
5
4
Ancient
60%
10
0
Anubis
60%
5
6
Vertigo
67%
6
2
Nuke
50%
4
12
Info
Match analysis of HAVU vs 1WIN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HAVU and 1WIN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, Anubis, and victory was secured by 1WIN. The MVP of this match was latt1kk.
1WIN analytics
The team 1WIN secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 1WIN were latt1kk contributed 57 kills and buster contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21603 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were Jelo contributed 41 kills and ottoNd contributed 36 kills. 19620 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent 1WIN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments