0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4516
Galil kills on a map
71.8168
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Player score (round)
36881010
Player score (round)
45111010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
67%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
50%
Dust II
0%
Vertigo
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
67%
3
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
50%
4
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
50%
2
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Ancient
100%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwlw
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of Haspers vs Nuclear TigeRES by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Haspers and Nuclear TigeRES, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Nuclear TigeRES. The MVP of this match was flouzer.
Nuclear TigeRES analytics
The team Nuclear TigeRES secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nuclear TigeRES were flouzer contributed 24 kills and fluffy contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9837 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nuclear TigeRES held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Haspers analytics
The team Haspers managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Haspers were AdrieN contributed 24 kills and bajmi contributed 13 kills. 9271 of total damage by Haspers could not prevent Nuclear TigeRES from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Haspers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments