0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
186.6606
Damage (total/round)
47373
Player score (round)
38521011
Player score (round)
37361011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37831011
Player score (round)
37401011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
57%
Overpass
50%
Ancient
36%
Mirage
33%
Inferno
17%
Anubis
17%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
8
Overpass
100%
1
6
Ancient
25%
8
2
Mirage
50%
4
2
Inferno
100%
1
2
Anubis
55%
11
0
Nuke
67%
3
5
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
57%
7
1
Overpass
50%
2
11
Ancient
61%
18
1
Mirage
83%
6
6
Inferno
83%
6
2
Anubis
38%
8
4
Nuke
67%
3
7
Info
Match analysis of GUN5 vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GUN5 and Nemiga, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by GUN5. The MVP of this match was lov1kus.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GUN5 were lov1kus contributed 34 kills and tried contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10989 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GUN5 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nemiga were khaN contributed 21 kills and 1eeR contributed 22 kills. 10322 of total damage by Nemiga could not prevent GUN5 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments