Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
1114.8354
Galil kills on a map
21.8161
Smoke thrown on a map
1014.8354
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.22
Smoke thrown on a map
1014.8354
Smoke thrown on a map
1014.8354
Smoke thrown on a map
1114.8354
Headshots on a map
9.020.3126
Player score (round)
34681011
Damage (total/round)
39573
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Overpass
50%
Mirage
43%
Inferno
36%
Ancient
31%
Anubis
13%
Nuke
7%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
9
Overpass
100%
1
6
Mirage
40%
5
2
Inferno
50%
2
2
Ancient
30%
10
3
Anubis
57%
14
0
Nuke
67%
3
6
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
9
2
Overpass
50%
2
13
Mirage
83%
6
7
Inferno
86%
7
3
Ancient
61%
18
1
Anubis
44%
9
5
Nuke
60%
5
7
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of GUN5 vs Nemiga by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GUN5 and Nemiga, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Nemiga. The MVP of this match was Xant3r.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nemiga were Xant3r contributed 11 kills and khaN contributed 4 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 3401 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were xiELO contributed 10 kills and FinigaN contributed 5 kills. 3356 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent Nemiga from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments