0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Assists on a map
13.924.4098
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
39973
Player score (round)
37801011
Player score (round)
34821011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Mirage
40%
Inferno
30%
Nuke
23%
Ancient
11%
Anubis
2%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Mirage
60%
5
1
Inferno
0%
2
0
Nuke
33%
3
5
Ancient
29%
14
3
Anubis
50%
12
3
Vertigo
0%
0
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Mirage
20%
15
6
Inferno
30%
20
2
Nuke
56%
18
6
Ancient
40%
25
2
Anubis
52%
23
7
Vertigo
0%
0
31
Info
Match analysis of GUN5 vs Entropiq by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GUN5 and Entropiq, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Entropiq. The MVP of this match was Buzz.
Entropiq analytics
The team Entropiq secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Entropiq were Buzz contributed 26 kills and regali contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9401 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Entropiq held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were tN1R contributed 18 kills and SELLTER contributed 20 kills. 8934 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent Entropiq from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments