0 Comments
73
80
18
-7
356
8:15
18
3
-4%
79
74
26
+5
372
15:8
20
0
+3%
Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:28s
Percentage of headshots
39%15%
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.13.8
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
Damage (total/round)
39373
Player score (round)
42341012
Damage (total/round)
38473
Player score (round)
45321012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Info
Map Analysis of Guild Eagles vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Guild Eagles on Anubis Analysis
Guild Eagles demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Guild Eagles on Anubis were sinnopsyy, who contributed 18 kills, and gxx-, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8187 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Guild Eagles held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included aVN, who contributed 18 kills, and brutmonster, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8555 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Guild Eagles from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments