0 Comments
49
76
14
-27
324
11:8
9
1
-16%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
67%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
42%
Mirage
29%
Anubis
12%
Ancient
11%
Overpass
10%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
3
17
Nuke
0%
0
27
Vertigo
33%
6
10
Mirage
79%
14
0
Anubis
56%
18
2
Ancient
39%
18
1
Overpass
50%
6
7
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
30
Nuke
50%
14
3
Vertigo
75%
12
4
Mirage
50%
6
14
Anubis
44%
16
3
Ancient
50%
14
6
Overpass
40%
10
10
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- wwwll
Info
Map Analysis of Guild Eagles vs ENCE by the Bo3.gg Team
ENCE on Anubis Analysis
ENCE demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ENCE on Anubis were hades, who contributed 23 kills, and Kylar, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8026 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, ENCE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Guild Eagles on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Guild Eagles, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Guild Eagles on Anubis included SENER1, who contributed 11 kills, and rigoN, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6164 total damage, Guild Eagles couldn't prevent ENCE from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Guild Eagles struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments