0 Comments
72
78
22
-6
336
12:10
16
3
Anubis5.7
-5%
Records Match
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
64%
Overpass
61%
Vertigo
54%
Nuke
54%
Ancient
50%
Anubis
18%
Inferno
17%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
4
2
Overpass
100%
4
1
Vertigo
0%
0
5
Nuke
0%
0
9
Ancient
50%
12
1
Anubis
50%
8
2
Inferno
33%
3
4
Last 5 maps
Mirage
36%
39
12
Overpass
39%
28
31
Vertigo
54%
26
22
Nuke
54%
39
4
Ancient
0%
0
70
Anubis
68%
56
0
Inferno
50%
30
10
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- wwwwl
Info
Match analysis of Gucci Academy vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gucci Academy and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Gucci Academy. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Gucci Academy analytics
The team Gucci Academy secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Gucci Academy were Ciocardau contributed 17 kills and shadiy contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8515 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Gucci Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 20 kills and nEMANHA contributed 16 kills. 7722 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Gucci Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments