GTZ Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

13

0

-1

71

0:1

3

1

6.4

-7%

6

13

2

-7

51

2:1

1

0

4.7

-28%

4

13

1

-9

41

0:1

1

0

4.0

-35%

3

13

3

-10

35

0:8

0

0

2.8

-41%

0

15

0

-15

8

0:2

0

0

2.2

-81%

Total

25

67

6

-42

206

2:13

5

1

4.0

-39%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

5

2

+20

144

5:0

7

0

10.0

+102%

12

4

4

+8

99

2:0

4

0

7.7

+31%

10

5

4

+5

76

2:0

3

0

6.5

+18%

10

5

5

+5

85

2:2

3

0

6.5

+33%

10

6

2

+4

65

2:0

2

0

6.4

+9%

Total

67

25

17

+42

469

13:2

19

0

7.4

+39%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of GTZ vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were simke, who contributed 25 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7034 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GTZ on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GTZ on Inferno included NOPEEJ, who contributed 12 kills, and snapy, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3084 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date