GTZ Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

23

4

+6

97

4:1

10

0

7.2

+23%

27

24

8

+3

93

3:2

6

1

6.8

+23%

27

29

6

-2

70

8:5

9

0

6.1

-9%

23

24

7

-1

69

2:3

4

1

5.9

+8%

20

23

6

-3

57

3:5

4

0

5.4

-12%

Total

126

123

31

+3

387

20:16

33

2

6.3

+6%

JANO Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

26

4

+6

88

5:3

10

0

6.8

+5%

27

26

4

+1

84

6:5

7

0

6.5

+9%

24

28

10

-4

88

3:3

5

0

6.3

+3%

20

25

2

-5

63

1:5

5

1

5.3

-9%

19

22

4

-3

53

1:4

5

1

5.3

-14%

Total

122

127

24

-5

376

16:20

32

2

6.1

-1%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of GTZ vs JANO by the Bo3.gg Team

JANO on Anubis Analysis

JANO demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for JANO on Anubis were allu, who contributed 32 kills, and sLowi, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 13539 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, JANO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GTZ on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GTZ on Anubis included aragornN, who contributed 29 kills, and Jaepe, who added 27 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13925 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent JANO from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date