0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
50%
Mirage
44%
Overpass
14%
Inferno
11%
Dust II
9%
Ancient
8%
Vertigo
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
50%
2
5
Mirage
75%
4
4
Overpass
57%
7
2
Inferno
46%
28
1
Dust II
64%
14
2
Ancient
45%
20
1
Vertigo
52%
23
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
29
Mirage
31%
16
10
Overpass
71%
17
4
Inferno
57%
30
1
Dust II
55%
11
14
Ancient
53%
32
0
Vertigo
48%
21
9
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- wlwww
Info
Map Analysis of GTZ vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
EYEBALLERS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno were SHiNE, who contributed 26 kills, and JW, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10684 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GTZ on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GTZ on Inferno included NOPEEJ, who contributed 24 kills, and Slaxx, who added 30 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10859 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent EYEBALLERS from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments