0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:16s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Player score (round)
40671010
Player score (round)
45251010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
75%
Ancient
53%
Dust II
50%
Inferno
G
31%
Anubis
G
30%
Nuke
17%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
75%
4
0
Anubis
63%
8
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
75%
16
0
Ancient
53%
19
2
Dust II
50%
10
0
Inferno
44%
9
3
Anubis
33%
18
0
Nuke
67%
6
2
Vertigo
0%
0
5
Info
Match analysis of Grindas vs TNL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Grindas and TNL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by TNL. The MVP of this match was cairne.
TNL analytics
The team TNL secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TNL were cairne contributed 28 kills and St0m4k contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12032 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TNL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Grindas analytics
The team Grindas managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Grindas were fylzas contributed 21 kills and BaGyZ contributed 20 kills. 10766 of total damage by Grindas could not prevent TNL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Grindas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments