Ancient
13 - 4
Dust II
9 - 13
Anubis
5 - 13
GR Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

15

0

0

88

2:2

5

0

6.3

+7%

14

13

3

+1

90

2:3

4

0

6.2

-2%

8

13

4

-5

54

1:2

3

1

5.1

-24%

7

14

0

-7

40

2:2

2

0

4.0

-26%

3

15

2

-12

36

0:3

0

0

3.3

-49%

Total

47

70

9

-23

307

7:12

14

1

5.0

-19%

WW Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

8

6

+11

94

1:0

3

1

8.3

+33%

15

9

4

+6

77

6:2

5

0

7.4

+23%

13

12

6

+1

91

2:1

4

0

6.8

+16%

10

8

4

+2

68

0:2

3

0

5.4

+5%

Total

70

47

22

+23

406

12:7

20

1

6.8

+21%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of GR vs WW by the Bo3.gg Team

WW on Anubis Analysis

WW demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for WW on Anubis were tried, who contributed 19 kills, and Aunkere, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7315 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, WW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GR on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GR, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GR on Anubis included weqt2, who contributed 15 kills, and mediocrity, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5519 total damage, GR couldn't prevent WW from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, GR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date