0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
83%
Overpass
50%
Mirage
47%
Anubis
17%
Nuke
9%
Inferno
5%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
6
Overpass
0%
2
9
Mirage
47%
15
1
Anubis
56%
18
1
Nuke
50%
6
15
Inferno
50%
6
16
Ancient
55%
22
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
83%
6
16
Overpass
50%
8
4
Mirage
0%
0
30
Anubis
73%
30
0
Nuke
59%
17
0
Inferno
55%
11
13
Ancient
50%
12
13
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- lwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of GR vs Lynn Vision by the Bo3.gg Team
GR on Inferno Analysis
GR demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for GR on Inferno were weqt2, who contributed 19 kills, and qqGOD, who added 11 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6839 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, GR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lynn Vision on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Lynn Vision, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lynn Vision on Inferno included Jee, who contributed 16 kills, and Westmelon, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4470 total damage, Lynn Vision couldn't prevent GR from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lynn Vision struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments