Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.42
Galil damage (avg/round)
22.35.6
Smoke thrown on a map
2215.0371
Shots (total/round)
11816
Shots (total/round)
8516
Player score (round)
35981012
Player score (round)
35631012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
56%
Inferno
24%
Nuke
18%
Mirage
17%
Ancient
10%
Vertigo
4%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
56%
9
18
Inferno
69%
13
19
Nuke
42%
19
7
Mirage
67%
9
13
Ancient
60%
10
6
Vertigo
71%
14
8
Dust II
17%
6
15
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
19
Inferno
45%
11
8
Nuke
60%
15
3
Mirage
50%
10
10
Ancient
50%
6
6
Vertigo
67%
6
9
Dust II
20%
5
17
Info
Match analysis of GODSENT vs MOUZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GODSENT and MOUZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by MOUZ. The MVP of this match was torzsi.
MOUZ analytics
The team MOUZ secured 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ were torzsi contributed 22 kills and NBK- contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9889 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GODSENT analytics
The team GODSENT managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GODSENT were dumau contributed 19 kills and latto contributed 18 kills. 8914 of total damage by GODSENT could not prevent MOUZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments