Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Player score (round)
41161012
Player score (round)
36061012
Player score (round)
56601012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38811012
Player score (round)
37161012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Anubis
62%
Nuke
40%
Ancient
17%
Inferno
11%
Mirage
8%
Overpass
5%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
3
3
Anubis
0%
1
10
Nuke
33%
3
6
Ancient
76%
17
0
Inferno
44%
9
2
Mirage
50%
8
3
Overpass
57%
7
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
46
Anubis
62%
13
12
Nuke
73%
26
5
Ancient
59%
22
10
Inferno
33%
21
13
Mirage
58%
26
4
Overpass
62%
13
18
Info
Match analysis of GODSENT vs FORZE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GODSENT and FORZE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by FORZE. The MVP of this match was tN1R.
FORZE analytics
The team FORZE secured 32 out of 58 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FORZE were tN1R contributed 46 kills and gokushima contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21410 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FORZE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GODSENT analytics
The team GODSENT managed to secure 26 out of 58 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GODSENT were Plopski contributed 46 kills and eraa contributed 46 kills. 20617 of total damage by GODSENT could not prevent FORZE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments