Vertigo
14 - 16
Nuke
16 - 5
Inferno
16 - 9
GODSENT Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

34

16

5

+18

127

4:1

9

1

9.4

+54%

18

16

8

+2

82

3:1

5

0

6.8

+6%

18

17

4

+1

66

4:0

2

0

6.4

-9%

12

10

4

+2

57

4:0

3

2

6.4

-5%

11

16

10

-5

66

3:4

3

0

5.5

+9%

Total

93

75

31

+18

398

18:6

22

3

6.9

+11%

AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

18

4

+3

93

4:3

5

1

7.1

+20%

16

21

2

-5

73

0:2

2

0

5.5

-8%

16

18

1

-2

61

1:3

4

0

5.3

-7%

11

17

5

-6

53

0:4

2

0

4.7

-5%

9

21

1

-12

49

0:5

1

0

4.1

-32%

Total

73

95

13

-22

329

5:17

14

1

5.3

-6%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of GODSENT vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team

GODSENT on Inferno Analysis

GODSENT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GODSENT on Inferno were Maden, who contributed 34 kills, and Farlig, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9949 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AGO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AGO, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno included Furlan, who contributed 21 kills, and GruBy, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8235 total damage, AGO couldn't prevent GODSENT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date