0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35761011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
18%
Mirage
8%
Nuke
4%
Ancient
3%
Anubis
3%
Vertigo
2%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
40%
5
5
Mirage
33%
3
1
Nuke
50%
14
0
Ancient
44%
16
1
Anubis
46%
13
0
Vertigo
50%
2
4
Overpass
0%
2
10
Last 5 maps
Inferno
58%
12
5
Mirage
25%
16
9
Nuke
46%
26
6
Ancient
47%
36
6
Anubis
43%
35
1
Vertigo
52%
25
3
Overpass
0%
1
25
Info
Match analysis of GenOne vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GenOne and PGE Turow, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by PGE Turow. The MVP of this match was Markoś.
PGE Turow analytics
The team PGE Turow secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PGE Turow were Markoś contributed 22 kills and darko contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8339 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PGE Turow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GenOne were drac contributed 20 kills and devoduvek contributed 14 kills. 6686 of total damage by GenOne could not prevent PGE Turow from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GenOne struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments