0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Player score (round)
36571011
Player score (round)
34911011
Damage (total/round)
38873
Player score (round)
37931011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
55%
Ancient
53%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
50%
Inferno
25%
Anubis
4%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
45%
11
0
Ancient
53%
15
1
Vertigo
50%
2
5
Mirage
50%
4
1
Inferno
25%
4
5
Anubis
46%
13
0
Overpass
0%
0
11
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
2
Anubis
50%
2
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Info
Match analysis of GenOne vs LEON by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GenOne and LEON, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by LEON. The MVP of this match was Unshaark.
LEON analytics
The team LEON secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LEON were Raijin contributed 20 kills and JIaYm contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11035 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LEON held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GenOne were Unshaark contributed 27 kills and Kursy contributed 26 kills. 10953 of total damage by GenOne could not prevent LEON from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GenOne struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
Comments