GENKID4M4 Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

15

3

-2

72

2:0

3

2

6.6

-7%

13

14

3

-1

85

0:3

4

0

6.0

+3%

13

13

4

0

72

1:1

2

0

5.9

+13%

9

16

5

-7

65

3:3

1

0

5.6

-8%

10

17

5

-7

60

2:3

1

0

5.3

-14%

Total

58

75

20

-17

354

8:10

11

2

5.9

-3%

Divina fe Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

13

6

+2

90

2:1

4

2

7.4

+11%

18

11

1

+7

81

1:2

5

1

7.2

+6%

15

11

6

+4

82

2:2

3

1

7.0

+18%

14

11

9

+3

97

2:1

2

0

7.0

+20%

12

12

5

0

75

3:2

2

0

6.1

+25%

Total

74

58

27

+16

426

10:8

16

4

6.9

+16%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of GENKID4M4 vs Divina fe by the Bo3.gg Team

Divina fe on Anubis Analysis

Divina fe demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Divina fe on Anubis were chjna, who contributed 15 kills, and ujliana, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7664 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Divina fe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GENKID4M4 on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GENKID4M4, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GENKID4M4 on Anubis included flystyle, who contributed 13 kills, and samys, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6366 total damage, GENKID4M4 couldn't prevent Divina fe from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, GENKID4M4 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date