Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.32
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
13.24.6
AWP damage (avg/round)
59.621.6
Player score (round)
35341012
Damage (total/round)
41673
Player score (round)
40271012
Damage (total/round)
39873
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
50%
Inferno
39%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
30%
Nuke
13%
Dust II
10%
Train
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
12
Inferno
17%
6
4
Vertigo
33%
3
1
Mirage
25%
4
0
Nuke
60%
5
1
Dust II
67%
3
3
Train
40%
5
3
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
6
11
Inferno
56%
18
2
Vertigo
0%
0
34
Mirage
55%
20
4
Nuke
47%
15
2
Dust II
57%
14
6
Train
43%
14
10
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Gen.G vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gen.G and OG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Train, and victory was secured by OG. The MVP of this match was mantuu.
OG analytics
The team OG secured 32 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Train. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for OG were mantuu contributed 52 kills and ISSAA contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19735 overall damage.
On the defensive side, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Gen.G analytics
The team Gen.G managed to secure 15 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Gen.G were autimatic contributed 38 kills and BnTeT contributed 36 kills. 16153 of total damage by Gen.G could not prevent OG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Gen.G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments