0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.2
6.9
Dust II1.7
Win Rounds
6
16
Dust II10
Kills
59
89
Dust II30
Damage
6.77K
9.38K
Dust II2605
Economy
400.9K
524.5K
Dust II123600
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Overpass
67%
Inferno
56%
Vertigo
56%
Mirage
50%
Ancient
36%
Nuke
20%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
15
5
Overpass
67%
3
18
Inferno
56%
18
5
Vertigo
56%
16
2
Mirage
50%
2
20
Ancient
36%
11
7
Nuke
87%
23
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwl
- wlwwl
Info
Match analysis of GearGaming vs B8 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GearGaming and B8, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by B8. The MVP of this match was r1nkle.
B8 analytics
The team B8 secured 0 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for B8 were r1nkle contributed 25 kills and cptkurtka023 contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9345 overall damage.
On the defensive side, B8 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GearGaming analytics
The team GearGaming managed to secure 22 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GearGaming were SP1NT contributed 15 kills and lesswill contributed 15 kills. 6772 of total damage by GearGaming could not prevent B8 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GearGaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments