0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.5986
Trades on a map
6.973.3972
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
43%
Mirage
33%
Nuke
14%
Anubis
13%
Ancient
9%
Vertigo
2%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
43%
14
0
Mirage
28%
18
2
Nuke
42%
12
4
Anubis
43%
14
0
Ancient
58%
24
0
Vertigo
40%
15
0
Dust II
29%
7
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
2
26
Mirage
61%
18
1
Nuke
56%
25
1
Anubis
30%
27
6
Ancient
67%
45
0
Vertigo
38%
8
16
Dust II
29%
7
10
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllww
- wwlww
Info
Match analysis of GL Academy vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GL Academy and HOTU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by HOTU. The MVP of this match was kade0.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HOTU were kade0 contributed 15 kills and Re1GN contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7035 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HOTU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GL Academy analytics
The team GL Academy managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GL Academy were God6y contributed 11 kills and Darber contributed 10 kills. 5321 of total damage by GL Academy could not prevent HOTU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GL Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments